by ASPLOS Steering Committee on Nov 30, 2021 | Tags: Conference, Policy, Reviewing
TL;DR The ASPLOS Steering Committee is considering two changes to the ASPLOS submission process: 1) three submission deadlines spread over the year, and 2) the possibility for papers near acceptance to be revised and resubmitted. This proposal outlines these changes....
Read more...
by Khari Douglas on Jun 25, 2021 | Tags: Accelerators, Interview, Machine Learning, Modelling, Policy
[Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared on the CCC blog (part 1 and part 2) and is re-posted here with permission.] A new episode of the Computing Community Consortium‘s (CCC) official podcast, Catalyzing Computing, is now available. In this episode, Khari...
Read more...
by Daniel A. Jiménez, Moin Qureshi, Boris Grot, and José Martínez on May 4, 2021 | Tags: Conference, Policy, Reviewing
As with all scientific communities, the field of computer architecture is driven by publications. At the heart of a meaningful scientific publication model is a fair and sound peer-reviewing process. If this process is compromised, some papers might be unfairly...
Read more...
by The SIGARCH Executive Committee on Feb 22, 2021 | Tags: ACM SIGARCH, Policy
On February 8th, 2021, ACM publicly announced a summary of the Joint Investigative Committee’s (JIC’s) investigation into allegations of professional and publications related misconduct in our community. The announcement stated that there were several individuals who...
Read more...
by Vijay Chidambaram on Dec 18, 2020 | Tags: Conference, Policy, Reviewing
Including one-shot revision in our peer review process could lead to lower overall reviewing load, better mental health for graduate students, and better overall science. Most of the top conferences in systems and architecture follow the binary decision model: the...
Read more...