Archive of posts tagged: Reviewing
Serving on Conference Program Committees
Good news: The computer architecture community is growing! Submissions to major conferences have increased substantially in recent years, including just under 500 submissions to MICRO 2024. This growth reflects the vibrancy in our field, continued expansion of what...
Confuseds, Strategists, and Snoozers: A Whimsical Odyssey Through the Maze of Paper Reviews
Navigating the labyrinthine corridors of academic publishing, authors often encounter three formidable guardians, each with their unique, sometimes perplexing, approach to gatekeeping. These are the Confused Reviewer, the Rational Reviewer, and the Lazy Reviewer....
ASPLOS’23 Program Chairs’ Recap
For 2023, ASPLOS embarked on a new multi-deadline review model. Multiple deadlines are meant to encourage authors to submit their papers when ready, to facilitate the selection of some papers for revision and to distribute the reviewer workload better. In this post,...
SIGARCH/TCCA Best Practices & Resources
Scientific progress relies on sound reviewing processes. The integrity of our review process is paramount, and it rests on our handling of ethical concerns and conflicts of interest. These issues have been compounded by the rapid growth in the computer architecture...Subscribe
