![Should conferences have a rebuttal phase?](https://www.sigarch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AdobeStock_352039435-300x175.jpeg)
Archive of posts tagged: Reviewing
![Should conferences have a rebuttal phase?](https://www.sigarch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AdobeStock_352039435-300x175.jpeg)
![Response to Change in the ASPLOS Conference Submission Process](https://www.sigarch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/AdobeStock_281838783-300x175.jpeg)
Response to Change in the ASPLOS Conference Submission Process
In late November, the ASPLOS Steering Committee published a proposal to change the paper submission process for ASPLOS by introducing three deadlines per year and the possibility of resubmitting a paper. The Steering Committee asked the ASPLOS community for its...![A New ASPLOS Conference Submission Process](https://www.sigarch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/AdobeStock_20842274-300x175.jpeg)
A New ASPLOS Conference Submission Process
TL;DR The ASPLOS Steering Committee is considering two changes to the ASPLOS submission process: 1) three submission deadlines spread over the year, and 2) the possibility for papers near acceptance to be revised and resubmitted. This proposal outlines these changes....![Using Extended Abstracts to Improve Peer Review](https://www.sigarch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/christos-favorite-picture-300x175.png)
Using Extended Abstracts to Improve Peer Review
Background When we started planning the ASPLOS’21 program committee in Spring 2020, we asked ourselves what we could do to make the review process better for everyone. In our opinion, the most impactful improvement would be to increase the signal available for each...![Best Practices for Conference Reviewing: An Invitation for Community Feedback](https://www.sigarch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/AdobeStock_236308471-300x175.jpeg)